违法所得没收程序的发展路径  

Study on the Confiscation of Illegal Income

加关注

作  者:刘颖[1] LIU Ying(Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区:[1]中央财经大学,北京100081

出  处:《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2019年第1期67-70,共4页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

摘  要:违法所得没收程序的设置初衷主要是完善我国的刑事没收制度,加强对贪污贿赂案件犯罪财产的追缴,填补刑事诉讼法的空缺,但是该程序在实践中适用并不广泛。2017年最高人民法院和最高人民检察院对没收程序的具体问题进行了较为详细的界定,但是,仍存在诸多争议之处。并且随着制度变革、监察委员会的设置、"缺席审判"的探讨等都对违法所得没收程序的适用提出了新的挑战。The original intention of the illegal income confiscation procedure is to perfect the criminal confiscation system in China,strengthen the recovery of the criminal assets in the case of corruption and bribery and fill the vacancy of the criminal procedure law,but the procedure is not widely applied in practice.Although the detailed definition of the specific problems in the confiscation procedures was made by the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s procuratorate in 2017,there are still many disputes.And the emergence of the supervisory commission and the discussion of“trial by default”all raise new challenges to the application of the illegal gains confiscation procedure with the reform of the system.

关 键 词:违法所得 证明标准 缺席判决 

分 类 号:DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学;政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象